RURAL-URBAN DISPARITIES IN ROMANIAN PRE- UNIVERSITY EDUCATION

ANDREEA-ELENA LUNGU
PhD Student , Valahia University of Targoviste
ORCID: 0009-0006-1978-3553
Email: andreealungu200@gmail.com

MIRCEA-CONSTANTIN DUICĂ
Professor, PhD, Valahia University of Targoviste
ORCID: 0000-0002-5106-638X
Email: mircea_duica@yahoo.com

ȘTEFAN LAURENȚIU PRAHOVEANU
PhD Student , SCOSAAR, Bucharest, Romania
ORCID: 0009-0009-0425-1070
Email: stefanprahoveanu@gmail.com

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/cike2025.50

Pages: 418–421

📄 Download PDF

Abstract

In recent decades, disparities between urban and rural areas in Romanian education have become more pronounced, against a backdrop of growing development gaps between these areas and the migration and aging of the rural population. These development gaps are evident not only in school results, but also in access to resources, the quality of teaching staff and school infrastructure. Rural schools face a shortage of specialized staff and the phenomenon of teacher “commuting,” which affects the continuity and quality of teaching. Teachers’ salaries are generally low, and in rural areas there are insufficient financial incentives to compensate for the difficult living conditions. Rural schools often have poor infrastructure, a lack of modern teaching materials, laboratories, and access to technology. Teaching in these conditions is challenging and can be discouraging for teachers. Many rural students come from poor families, which adds pressure on teachers, who have to manage not only educational issues but also the social and health problems of their students. In this context, this paper provides a comparative analysis of the disparities between rural and urban education in Romania, based on statistical data, which may be useful for informing decisions in this area and reducing risks.

Keywords: disparities, insufficient financial incentives, comparative analysis

JEL Classification: I21, I25

References

    1. Barow, T., & Berhanu, G. (2021). Inclusive education in Sweden: 35Policy, politics, and practice. In Dialogues between Northern and Eastern Europe on the development of inclusion (pp. 34-51).
    2. Brewis, E. (2025). Higher education and the public good in Finland. Higher Education, 89(1), 205-222.
    3. Constantinou, E. K., Flynn, P., & Verchier, Y. (2025). Defining the teaching profiles of academic staff across a European universities alliance: Lessons learned after the pandemic and the way into the future. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies.
    4. Cowen, R. (2009). The transfer, translation and transformation of educational processes: and their shape‐shifting?. Comparative Education, 45(3), 315-327.
    5. Halász, G. (2015). E ducation and Social Transformation in C entral and E astern E urope. European Journal of Education, 50(3), 350-371.
    6. Högberg, B., & Lindgren, J. (2023). From a crisis of results to a crisis of wellbeing–education reform and the declining sense of school belonging in Sweden. Comparative Education, 59(1), 18-37.
    7. Jahnukainen, M., Hienonen, N., Lintuvuori, M., & Lempinen, S. (2023). Inclusion in Finland: Myths and realities. In Finland’s famous education system: Unvarnished insights into Finnish schooling (pp. 401-415). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
    8. Jessop, B. (2004). The European Union and Recent Transformations. The state of Europe: Transformations of statehood from a European perspective, 75.
    9. Noelke, C., & Mueller, W. (2011). Social transformation and education systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Making the transition. Education and labour market entry in Central and Eastern Europe, 1-28.
    10. Safonov, Y., Usyk, V., & Bazhenkov, I. (2022). Digital transformations of education policy. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 8(2), 127-136.
    11. Turchyn, A., Kashuba, O., Kravchuk, Т., Navolska, H., & Derkach, H. (2022). The dual model of practical professional and pedagogical training of future teachers for vocational schools in Germany. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 13(2), 713-728.
    12. Zutavern, S., & Seifried, J. (2022). Vocational education and training in Germany: Benefits and drawbacks of the dual approach as preparation for professional employment. In Research Approaches on Workplace Learning: Insights from a Growing Field (pp. 347-365). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Scroll to Top