ENERGY VULNERABILITY – A STRUCTURAL DETERMINANT OF LIVING STANDARDS IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

ALIONA BALAN
PhD, Associate Professor, Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova
ORCID: 0000-0003-0094-7272
Email: balan.a@ase.md

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/cike2025.24

Pages: 192–197

📄 Download PDF

Abstract

This study analyzes the evolution of energy vulnerability in the Republic of Moldova from 2020 to 2023 and assesses its impact on the population’s standard of living. Using a mixed methodological approach based on data from the Household Budget Survey (HBS), the research demonstrates that energy vulnerability has become a fundamental structural determinant of quality of life. The results highlight an increase in the energy burden from 14.5% in 2020 to 15.2% in 2023, exceeding common international affordability thresholds. Rural-urban disparities have significantly widened, with rural areas reaching a critical energy burden of 17.0%, compared to 13.7% in urban areas. The multidimensional analysis reveals that energy vulnerability exerts systemic negative effects on public health, educational performance, economic productivity, and social cohesion. The study concludes that energy vulnerability is a structural problem that exacerbates social inequalities and requires urgent and differentiated public policies focused on energy efficiency, financial support, and infrastructure development.

Keywords: energy vulnerability, energy poverty, standard of living, energy efficiency, social equity, Republic of Moldova.

JEL Classification: Q40, I32, Q48, O18

Acknowledgement

This article was developed within the framework of project No. 25.80012.0807.57SE “Estimation of energy vulnerability and its impact on the living standards of the population of the Republic of Moldova”, funded by the state budget.

References

    1. National Bureau of Statistics of the Republic of Moldova. (2023). Aspects regarding the standard of living of the population, editions 2007-2023. https://statistica.gov.md/ro/aspecte-privind-nivelul-de-trai-al-populatiei-editiile-2007-2023-9674_59480.html
    2. Balan, A. (2024). The relationship between renewable energy consumption and human development. Economy and Sociology, (1), 50-56. https://economy-sociology.ince.md/index.php/Economy_and_Sociology/article/view/181
    3. Boardman, B.(1991). Fuel Poverty: From Cold Homes to Affordable Warmth. London: Belhaven Press. ISBN: 978-1852930813
    4. Bouzarovski, S., & Petrova, S.(2015). A global perspective on domestic energy deprivation: Overcoming the energy poverty–fuel poverty binary. Energy Research & Social Science, 10, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.06.007
    5. Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Moldova. (2023). The Residential Energy Efficiency Fund will have a budget of at least 723 million lei over the next three years. https://www.energie.gov.md/en/content/residential-energy-efficiency-fund-will-have-budget-least-723-million-lei-over-next-three
    6. Champagne, S.N., Phimister, E., Macdiarmid, J.I., & Guntupalli, A.M.(2023). Assessing the impact of energy and fuel poverty on health: a European scoping review. European Journal of Public Health, 33(5), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad108
    7. (2023). Energy poverty indicators. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Energy_poverty
    8. International Energy Agency (IEA).(2022; 2023). World Energy Outlook 2023. Paris: IEA Publications. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ed1e4c42-5726-4269-b801-97b3d32e117c/WorldEnergyOutlook2023.pdf
    9. (2020). How’s Life? 2020: Measuring Well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/how-s-life/volume-/issue-_9870c393-en.html
    10. Thomson, H., & Bouzarovski, S.(2019). Addressing energy poverty in the European Union: State of play and action. Energy Poverty. https://energy-poverty.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2024-05/paneureport2018_updated2019.pdf
    11. Thomson, H., & Snell, C.(2013). Quantifying the prevalence of fuel poverty across the European Union. Energy Policy, 52, 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.009
Scroll to Top