DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND INTERNATIONAL VISIBILITY OF MOLDOVAN SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS

RODICA CUJBA
PhD in Economy, Information Society Development Institute, Technical University of Moldova, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova
ORCID: 0000-0002-7982-6184
Email: rodica.cujba@idsi.md
(corresponding author)

NELLY ȚURCAN
Habilitated Doctor, University Professor Information Society Development Institute, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova Moldova State University, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova
ORCID: 0000-0001-8475-0770
Email: nelly.turcan@idsi.md,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/cike2025.105

Pages: 833–846

📄 Download PDF

Abstract

This study evaluates the online accessibility and international visibility of scientific journals from the Republic of Moldova by analyzing the technical and functional features of their websites. In an era where a journal’s digital presence is fundamental to its reach and impact, many smaller academic communities risk marginalization. Applying a structured evaluation framework, this research assesses key website characteristics – Including domain architecture, publishing platforms, metadata implementation, and archive currency – against international best practices. The findings reveal a concerted effort towards internationalization, evidenced by the presence of an English-language version on 80% of the sites. However, this intent is counteracted by significant technical deficiencies. A reliance on subdomains or pages within institutional websites limits autonomy and professional perception, while the low adoption of specialized platforms like Open Journal Systems (OJS) hinders efficient editorial management and metadata standardization. Critically, fewer than half of the journals provide individual, persistent URLs and comprehensive metadata for their articles, severely compromising discoverability by major databases and search engines. Furthermore, over one-third of journals exhibit irregularly updated archives, posing a direct threat to their credibility and indexing eligibility. The study concludes that strategic modernization of the technical and editorial infrastructure is urgently required for Moldovan journals to enhance their global visibility, establish credibility, and increase their scientific impact. The findings offer a model for similar small research ecosystems aiming to navigate the complexities of digital scholarly communication and achieve greater integration into the global academic conversation.

 

Keywords: Moldovan scientific journals, journal website, journal visibility, journal accessibility, website technical features

JEL Classification: I23, D83, O33

References

    1. Björk, B.-C., 2007. A model of scientific communication as a global distributed information system. Information Research, 12 (2), paper 307. Available at: https://informationr.net/ir/12-2/paper307.html [Accessed 10 September 2025].
    2. Cujba, R., 2019. The role of persistent identifiers in e-Science. Journal of Social Sciences, 2(4), pp. 40-46. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3550705
    3. Fogg B. J., 2003. Prominence-interpretation theory: explaining how people assess credibility online. CHI ’03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 722-723. https://doi.org/10.1145/765891.765951
    4. Gasparyan, A. Y., Yessirkepov, M., Voronov, A. A., Gorin, S. V., Koroleva, A. M., & Kitas, G. D., 2016. Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 31(9), pp. 1351-1357. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1351
    5. Jackson, A. S., Han, M.-J., Groetsch, K., Mustafoff, M., and Cole, T. W., 2008. Dublin Core metadata harvested through OAI-PMH. Journal of Library Metadata, 8(1), pp. 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J517v08n01_02
    6. Maron, D. and Feinberg, M., 2018. What does it mean to adopt a metadata standard? A case study of Omeka and the Dublin Core. Documentation, 74, pp.674-691. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2017-0095
    7. OASPA, COPE, DOAJ, & WAME, 2018. Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing (4th edition). Available at: https://doaj.org/bestpractice [Accessed 27 August 2025].
    8. Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, Alperin JP, Matthias L, Norlander B, Farley A, West J, and Haustein S., 2018. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6:e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375
    9. Pranckute, R., 2021. Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World. , 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
    10. Rieger, O. Y., 2008. Preservation in the Age of Large-Scale Digitization. A White Paper. Council on Library and Information Resources. ISBN 978-1-932326-29-1. Available at: https://www.clir.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/pub141.pdf [Accessed 20 August 2025].
    11. Țurcan, N., 2025. The Impact of Scientific Publication Policies on the International Visibility of Research in the Republic of Moldova: a Case Study of Indexing in International Databases. Intellectus, 1, pp. 37-55. https://doi.org/10.56329/1810-7087.25.1.04
    12. Ware, M. and Mabe, M., 2015. The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (4th edition). International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/9/ [Accessed 30 August 2025].
    13. Van de Sompel, H., Nelson, M. L., Lagoze, C., and Warner, S., 2004. Resource harvesting within the OAI-PMH framework. D-Lib Magazine, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.1045/december2004-vandesompel
    14. Visser, E., & Weideman, M., 2011. An empirical study on website usability elements and how they affect search engine optimisation. South African Journal of Information Management, 13(1), 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v13i1.428

     

Scroll to Top