DECEPTIVE PRACTICES IN SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

GHEORGHE CUCIUREANU
, Information Society Development Institute, National Agency for Quality Assurance in Education and Research Chișinău, Republic of Moldova
ORCID: 0000-0003-2140-0591
Email: gheorghe.cuciureanu@idsi.md

VALERIA VRABIE
, Information Society Development Institute, National Agency for Quality Assurance in Education and Research Chișinău, Republic of Moldova
ORCID: 0000-0002-2651-7150
Email: valeria.vrabie@anacec.md

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/cike2025.102

Pages: 810–817

📄 Download PDF

Abstract

The article examines the phenomenon of deceptive practices in the publication of scientific results in the Republic of Moldova, with particular emphasis on predatory publishing. Such practices constitute dissemination methods driven by the pursuit of rapid financial gain, undermining research integrity and eroding trust in science. Evidence indicates a significant prevalence of these practices across all scientific fields among researchers in the Republic of Moldova. One such practice is the phenomenon of so-called “ghost conferences”, exemplified by the case of InterConf. The authors also identify domestic manifestations of such practices, including publication in journals that accept manuscripts without peer review, or conferences that publish papers and issue certificates without actual participation. In addition to predatory publishing, the article highlights other deceptive practices: (1) dubious patents, particularly those acquired in the United Kingdom, which fail to meet invention criteria and mislead the scholarly community; and (2) pseudo-scientific rankings, such as the AD Scientific Index or Moldova H-index, which rely on opaque methodologies and promote paid services to artificially inflate visibility. These phenomena appear to stem not only from deliberate attempts at fraud, but also from a deficient research culture, institutional pressures to publish, and the absence of a robust system for regulation and education in research ethics. The authors advocate for the recognition and eradication of such practices through coherent policies and systemic interventions.

 

Keywords: Predatory publishing, scientific integrity, deceptive practices, research evaluation, pseudo-scientific rankings.

JEL Classification: I23, I28, O39

References

    1. Beall, J., 2017. What I learned from predatory publishers. Biochem Medica, 27, pp.273–278. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.029
    2. Callaghan, C. W., and Nicholson, D. R., 2020. Predatory publishing and predatory journals: a critical review and proposed research agenda for higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(10), pp.1433–1449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1695762
    3. Cojocaru, I., Cuciureanu, G., and COJOCARU, Ig., 2022. Researchers’ Quest for Productivity and Visibility: The Growing Problem of Predatory Publishing in the Republic of Moldova. Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days , Ed. 4, 22-23 septembrie 2022, Budapesta. Viena: Facultas Verlags- und Buchhandels, pp. 123-129. https://doi.org/10.24989/ocg.v341.0
    4. Conlogue, B.C., Gilman, N.V., and Holmes, L.M., 2022. Open access and predatory publishing: a survey of the publishing practices of academic pharmacists and nurses in the United States. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 110(3), pp.294–305. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1377.
    5. Cuciureanu, G., 2025a. Moldovan scientific conferences: Predatory or merely misguided? European Science Editing 51: e150991. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2025.e150991
    6. Cuciureanu, G., 2025b. Programul de Stat 2020–2023 și fenomenul publicării de tip prădător. Intellectus, 2025, 1, pp.24-36. https://doi.org/10.56329/1810-7087.25.1.03
    7. Cuciureanu, G., Pișcenco, M., Vrabie, V,, Minciună, V, and Daniliuc, A., 2024. Analiză critică și perspective pentru asigurarea calităţii manifestărilor știinţifice din Republica Moldova: Studiu de caz 2023. Intellectus, 2, pp.94-102. https://doi.org/10.56329/1810-7087.24.2.09
    8. Cuciureanu, G., 2024. What is predatory publishing and what impact it has.  Journal of Social Sciences, 7 (4), pp.133-143. https://doi.org/10.52326/jss.utm.2024.7(4).10
    9. Diez, 2024. O cercetătoare din Moldova a realizat o dronă pentru agricultura inteligentă. Vehiculul a fost brevetat în Marea Britanie. Available at: https://diez.md/2024/01/24/o-cercetatoare-din-moldova-a-realizat-o-drona-pentru-agricultura-inteligenta-vehiculul-a-fost-brevetat-in-marea-britanie/ [Accessed 12 August 2025]
    10. InterAcademy Partnership Report, 2022. Combatting Predatory Academic Journals and Conferences. Available at: https://www.interacademies.org/publication/predatory-practices-report-English [Accessed 12 August 2025]
    11. Freilich, J., and Ouellette, L.L., 2019. Science fiction: Fictitious experiments in patents. Science 364, pp.1036-1037(2019). DOI:1126/science.aax0748
    12. Moldovan National H-index Ranking, 2025. Available at: https://md.h-index.com/ro [Accessed 31 March 2025]
    13. Moldoveanu, B., and Cuciureanu, G., 2020. Publishing as an Indicator of Scientific Research Quality and Ethics: The Case of Law Journals from Moldova. In: Science and Engineering Ethics, 2(26), pp.1039-1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00189-2
    14. ReatractionWatch, 2021. Available: https://retractionwatch.com/2021/12/07/researchers-sound-alarm-on-predatory-rankings/ [Accessed 31 March 2025]
    15. Richardson, R., Wise, N., Hong, S., Draper, M., and Fackrell, S., 2025. Exploitation of intellectual property systems for the manipulation of academic reputations. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 21 (15), pp.1-27. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14889136
    16. Shrestha, J., 2020. Authors beware! Publishing in predatory journals is harmful. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources,3(2), pp.1–8. https://doi.org/10.3126/janr.v3i2.32293
Scroll to Top